US on its way to attack Iran

Did I miss something? Is Iran harboring Bin Laden? Were they behind 9/11? Or has Bush already decided to attack, maybe for the same reasons as he's torn apart Iraq - "Our God is mightier than your God" - because they are predominately Muslims? Is this really over oil, terrorism, 'regional stablility', 'democracy,' or is it just more geo-politicking from the right-wing war-mongering neo-cons? Maybe the move to send a second group of American destroyer battleships into the region, while Iran reinforces its border is as the author mentions, to 'stage' another Gulf of Tonkin Incident?

Tough questions for a US President with his lowest approval rating ever - 28%. Its hard for most other people of the world to understand how HALF of the voting poplulation in America re-elected him in the first place, but not that hard when you look at history, espeically on the side of the Americans. Of course most folks know that his big daddy - Bush Senior - was head of the CIA throughout the 70's, helped Regan route out evil in places like Afghanistan and Central America throughout the 80's and now - the Middle East - first Bush Senior and now his wild gun-toting elder son, GW. The Bush family and GW, now the most successful political dynasty in American history, resemble nightmarishly similarities to JR on the popular TV show of the late 1970's Dallas (1) gone hay-wire (talk about political propaganda)!

And the saddest part is that the other half of the country that didn't vote for GW Bush is now elated by the fact that the democrats control the house and the senate. I say SO WHAT?! Hillary's probably behind the attack too... its bigger than one person in charge of the oval office: its our way of life - to preserve our way of life - no matter what the cost... ancient 20th centrury thinking.

WAKE UP PEOPLE OF AMERICA! Pretty soon we will not be able to travel ANYWHERE as people around the world, even here in Argentina, scoff at us Yanquis and our EVIL global-imperialistic ways, accusing of us of trying to take over the world, the new colonialists.

1 - Back in 1978, DALLAS was described quite simply - and as about as quietly as it began on the box - as a series 'of dramatic feuds in the land of the big rich.'

The Dallas team insist the show has nothing to do with capitalism, big oil, rich v. poor, the abuse of power or any social issues at all., (They may be right; there's very (little sign, for instance, of the large Vietnamese population of Dallas in the show). It's just about emotions, say the production team. And as everything in Texas is always said to be larger, 'bigger, huger, than life, so is Texas emotion.